Warning: This module may not support sharing across sites

You are attempting to add a reference to this module that exists on another site in this group. This module may or may not support sharing across multiple sites - it doesn't explicitly state either way whether it does.

If you are sure that it does, or if your intent is to test its ability to do so, then proceed with caution and be aware that certain functionality in the module - or even the entire module - may not function correctly in this configuration.

If you are confused by this message or are working on a site that cannot tolerate any breakage, you should click Cancel and contact the DotNetNuke Support Team.

page shadow

Selecting/Comparing Technology & Alternative Fuels

Selecting/Comparing Technology & Alternative Fuels

The Green Truck Association (GTA) believes that all viable technologies and fuels have a place when applied to the right application. The challenge is determining the best option for your unique need.

The GTA encourages the use of systems and tools to deliver better results and facilitate the comparison of alternatives. 

To find the best fuel-saving technology or alternative fuel for your application, there is a Hierarchy of Application, as well as a series of steps you should always take:

  • Develop a base line
    • This can be as simple as calculating the mileage you drive and the amount of fuel used, or it can be done with sophisticated drive and duty cycle data collection tools, such as data loggers and GPS systems.
  • Select the technology you want to consider
  • Using a life cycle cost tool, determine the value your investment will return. Also recognize that there is the non-finance value of reduced GHG and criteria pollutants
    • Life cycle cost calculators vary in sophistication. GTA has both a robust and simple calculator available to members. The AFLEET tool, as well as many others, have life cycle cost calculators built into them.

Technology and Fuel Comparisons
While the GTA recognizes that comparison of benefits can be made with numbers derived from simple considerations of theoretical fuel cost differences and or estimated fuel savings, we recommend a more empirical approach.

The free tools available from Argonne National Laboratory’s AFLEET Tool, offer the ability to get comprehensive comparative analysis.

The GTA is working with the NREL and has arranged for GTA members to provide their drive and duty cycle data and receive analysis. Currently, the GTA is beta testing this process with the Greater Indiana Clean Cities Coalition within the City of Indianapolis' fleet using NREL and Argonne National Laboratory tools.